Skip to main content

CFE Blog

Blog April 21, 2026

The Fed’s “Lawful Access” Bill C-22 is an Unprecedented Assault on Canadians’ Privacy Rights and Must Be Withdrawn – Letter to the Prime Minister

Today, the Centre for Free Expression, along with 13 other civil liberties and human rights organizations, sent an open letter to the Prime Minister, key Cabinet ministers, and leaders of opposition parties calling for the withdrawal of the Government’s “Lawful Access” Bill C-22 that is being whisked through Parliament at a pace assuring it can be given no serious consideration.
Blog March 26, 2026

What does it mean for the state to be neutral in religious matters?

In a recent column in the Toronto Star, Tonda MacCharles highlighted what she saw as an inconsistency between the argument currently being made before the Supreme Court of Canada in the Bill 21 case, that governments should remain neutral in religious matters, and the assertion by Prime Minister Carney in a recent speech that “religious values can and should frame how politicians act”.&nbsp
Blog March 20, 2026

Unsafe in the library

What makes you feel unsafe? Do you feel threatened by a book – or by a picture in a book? Recently a children’s book in Manitoba was temporarily removed from a school division’s library shelves because some adults said it made them feel unsafe. They had no problem with the text which is a simple story of a child helping her grandmother prepare a special meal for the family.
Blog February 3, 2026

Celebrating the People and Practices That Sustain Intellectual Freedom

Freedom to Read Week 2026 (February 22–28) is an occasion for reflection and for recognition at a time of increased demands for censorship. Across Canada, library leadership, librarians, paraprofessional staff, and library trustees have spent the past year doing the essential work that intellectual freedom depends on—often under scrutiny, and always in service of the public good.
Blog January 21, 2026

The “right to be forgotten” arrives in Canada

The interests at stake in a recent investigation[1] by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (the “OPC”) can be evoked in two imaginative exercises. First, how would you feel if you had been accused of a crime, the charge had been stayed many years ago, but news articles about the incident were still easily accessible to anyone who typed your name into a search engine?