Upcoming Event June 10, 2025

Should Political Belief and Association Be Protected by Human Rights Law?

Date
-

Add to calendar

Location
Online

Human rights acts in nine provinces and territories prohibit discrimination based on political belief – either broadly or narrowly defined – while four do not. Should political belief and political association have the same protections as other prohibited grounds of discrimination such as race, nationality, ethnic origin, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and marital status? Why or why not?

Panelists:

  • Birju Dattani, Past Executive Director, Yukon Human Rights Commission; former Assistant Regional Director, Alberta Human Rights Commission
  • Abby Deshman, Interim General Counsel & Executive Director, Canadian Civil Liberties Association; Lawyer, St. Lawrence Barristers
  • Michael Gottheil, Senior Counsel, ARCH Disability Law Centre; former Chief of the Commission and Tribunals, Alberta Human Rights Commission
  • Michael Lynk, Professor Emeritus of Law, Western University; Labour Arbitrator, Ontario Grievance Settlement Board

Moderator:

  • Faisal Bhabha, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School; Former Vice-Chair, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

Zoom link to event torontomu.zoom.us/j/91941276567

This is a free event and no registration is required.

Please contact cfe@torontomu.ca if you require accommodation to ensure inclusion in this event.

Related

Blog March 11, 2025

Jangling the Bells: The Report of the Third-Party Investigation of the Clearing of the Palestinian Solidarity Encampment at the University of Alberta

On 11 May 2024, in the predawn hours, members of the Edmonton Police Service walked onto the campus at the University of Alberta dressed in riot gear to execute the direction of the University of Alberta’s president, Bill Flanagan, that they clear away a Palestinian solidarity encampment that had been set up just two days before. Flanagan’s choice to exercise coercive force against the protestors, whose encampment was peaceful, so outraged the University of Alberta community that there were numerous calls for Flanagan’s resignation.
Carolyn Sale
Academic Freedom, Freedom of Expression & Its Limits
Court Submission March 10, 2025

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Animal Justice et al. ONCA Court File No. COA-24-CV-0553

CFE Intervener Factum in the Ontario Court of Appeal This case concerns the Government of Ontario law, Security from Trespass and Protecting Food Safety Act, 2020, and associated Regulation whose stated purpose is to prevent trespass, protect animal safety, protect biosecurity of the food supply chain, protect those working with animals and prevent the adverse economic effects that these risks can create. The CFE intervention addresses how the Act and Regulation penalize employees who are prospective whistleblowers engaging in expressive activity in pursuit of truth and social discourse. The Act and Regulation also compel employee expression by mandating and controlling the timing of whistleblower disclosure. And although the Regulation purports to provide an exception for whistleblowers, it is so narrow as to be illusory.
Freedom of Expression & Its Limits, Whistleblower Protection